Fable III Review

   27/10/2010 at 20:27       Richard Horne       18 COMMENTS. - Score 4/5
 - Fable III, Lionhead Studios, Peter Molyneux, RPG, Xbox 360 Exclusive

How much enjoyment you’ll get out of Lionhead Studios’ Fable III will depend a lot on how much you got out of this popular British developer’s previous entries in the series. You see – and I’ll whisper this quietly for fear of recrimination - it’s not actually all that different to Fable II. A fact which is actually very surprising considering the typical bluster and hyperbole that comes out of company mouthpiece Peter Molyneux’s gob on a daily basis – we love you really Peter, please make another Syndicate game.

Like so many sequels these days, Fable III iterates, tweaks and expands upon the core fundamentals of the previous game to deliver an improved and enhanced experience that’s more than familiar to existing fans, but simultaneously manages to remain easily accessible to newcomers to the series. This is great if you’re already a fan, but is certainly going to do nothing to convince you otherwise if you’re not.

And normally at this point I’d wax lyrical something about how this sequel has added a tremendous amount of spit and polish to the franchise, but I’m afraid in this instance, you’re more likely to notice a lack of the aforementioned. While Lionhead has managed to build yet another magical, vivid and inspiring interpretation of Albion, at times some of its elements look like up-scaled Xbox-era assets. Rubbish lip-synching, frequent loading issues, low-polygon models, bland textures, horrendous slow-down and sub-standard RPG-tropes mean things don’t get off to a brilliant start. For the first couple of hours it feels oh-so-predictable. The initially-limited variety of NPC interactions feels stifling and restrictive. The clichéd fairytale about a prince turned bad with his younger brother waiting in the wings to take over the throne, lacks impact when compared to the glorious innocent opening of Fable II. And the inescapable been-there done-that feeling makes you wonder if you’ve wasted your hard-earned cash.

But then thankfully things do start to progress, and slowly but surely the subtle additions to the series start to show their worth. For instance, one of the biggest changes is the removal of an in-game menu-screen. It’s instead been replaced with a sanctuary, where your loyal butler Jasper - brilliantly voiced by John Cleese - will look after your weapons, costumes, gauntlets and other in-game paraphernalia. What would previously have been an option on the main-menu screen is now represented by a room. For example, your weapons are stored and selected in the armoury, while clothes are hung on mannequins in the changing room. It’s a really nice touch and carries on the Fable tradition of cleverly disguising the serious RPG elements other similar games would instead choose to represent with convoluted spreadsheets and detailed statistics.

One thing Fable games have always had is humour by the bucket-load and Fable III is no exception. We British are well known for our base and often crude sense of humour and this is perfectly represented throughout. Nowhere more so than in the myriad ways in which it’s possible to interact with the many people you’ll meet throughout your quest. As ever you can interact both positively and negatively with them and the dance interaction, which ends rather camply with the famous lift from the Dirty Dancing movie, is brilliant realised. While at the other end of the spectrum, grabbing an NPC’s head before breaking wind in their face and watching as they vomit and often pass out is childish, puerile, immature and bloody brilliant.

The further you progress through the game the more interactions you’ll unlock and the clever use of these helps aid your progress as you either unleash a charm offensive to get people on your side, or conversely, make enemies of all and sundry. Similarly to both previous games it’s possible to play as a good or evil character and how you engage others throughout has a dramatic effect on their feelings towards you as well as your own visual manifestation.

The visuals of the game have also been heavily influenced by the fact that in this version of Albion, the industrial revolution is in full swing. So rather bizarrely you'll encounter monorails, artillery weapons and power-stations. The game also deals with the dark oppressive themes asociated with this period such as child labour, poverty and horrendous working conditions, but delivers them in that typical pantomine style that takes the hard edges off what would otherwise be a sombre and melancholic subject matter. This industrial revolution also has an impact on your inventory, with guns taking on a more prominent role. Pistols, shotguns and rifles are all present and correct with each giving you a choice to make between power vs. range.

What’s also refreshing is how the game often presents you with binary choices – do this or do that – but delivers them in such a way that’s it not always obvious which is the good choice and which the bad. For instance, early on you’ve to decide between killing a group of villagers or killing a single solitary love interest. Neither option is particularly heart-warming but which will benefit you the most?

And in addition to the already mentioned John Cleese, Fable III continues the tradition of hiring an ensemble cast with Stephen Fry, Zoe Wanamaker, Simon Pegg, Sir Ben Kingsley, Jonathan Ross and Jason Manford among the more recognizable voices you’ll encounter throughout the game. And while many games have featured renowned actors in the past, they’ve usually always been let down by an awful script. Thankfully the writing in Fable III is mostly excellent with genuinely laugh-out-loud funny moments prevalent throughout.

The game’s also at its best when it escapes from traditional gaming conventions and breaks that fabled fourth wall. One mission in particular involving medieval pen and paper RPG players is an extremely witty allegory of the processes of game development and is well worth hunting down. Another sees you dressing up in all manner of outlandish costumes as you take on the roles of various characters in a collection of scenes from a play. Each one poking fun at common videogame tropes while simultaneously rewarding you for taking the time to deviate from the main quest.

But then this high quality writing is occasionally let down by numerous examples of typical RPG fodder including the obligatory and hideous fetch-quest, and it's this constant battle of really high quality moments running parallel with hideously low quality ones that make it difficult to come to a firm conclusion on either side of the fence.

To return to my opening salvo, if you played and enjoyed the previous games in the series then there’s plenty to here to love. It’s not revolutionary by any means but it’s consistently well written, engaging and full of depth. But the graphical shortcomings, including possibly the worst screen-tearing I’ve ever seen in an Xbox 360 game, regularly and negatively contribute towards the overall experience. Sure, installing the game to the hard-drive helps massively, but this should never be used an excuse for – like so many other games during this quarter – being rushed out of the door in order to maximise the profits of the pre-Christmas sales boom. The addition of a more polished Co-Op experience also gives you another reason to visit Albion, just don’t go in expecting the streets to be paved with gold.

User Comments:

You must sign up for an AATG account and login in order to post comments

Sillothian - on 27/10/2010 at 22:47 wrote:
Nice review Hairy. It seems to be the general consensus that this is more Fable 2.5 than Fable 3.

I give it 3 months before Peter Molyneux starts saying the game didn't live up to his expectations ;-)

HairyArse - on 28/10/2010 at 00:24 wrote:
Did anyone hear that? Whizzo is that you? :P

That's what I get for rushing this out the door before scuttling off to watch The Apprentice.

/hastily edits and finishes off unfinished paragraphs.

Trip SkyWay - on 28/10/2010 at 06:15 wrote:
Sounds like I'd enjoy that.I might hang on for the PC version, see if that brings many technical upgrades. RPS were suggesting said it might arrive with the relaunch of the Games for Windows store.

peej - on 28/10/2010 at 10:08 wrote:
"To return to my opening salvo, if you played and enjoyed the previous games in the series then there's plenty to here to love."

I think that's me out then, I struggled through the first (struggled to keep enough focus to finish it) and didn't finish the second, it'd be pointless me grabbing this even though the Industrial Revolution and that period of history is fascinating to me (though naturally it'd probably be an even more engaging gameworld with a steampunky look and feel to it).

Might pick it up cheap later on I guess.

Syrok - on 28/10/2010 at 12:54 wrote:
Like Fable 2, this once again got me to consider buying a 360. :)

Kay - on 28/10/2010 at 13:53 wrote:
Nice review Hairy, I still wonder how you manage to find the time to play and review all these games. :)

I enjoyed Fable II - enough to complete all the quests including both pieces of DLC - but I found elements of it to be deeply flawed and disappointing. It was also far too lightweight at times for my liking (the combat in particular was a bit dull), not to mention the technical flaws (loading times, tearing, frame-rate etc.) that detracted from the experience. But I still found it a rather fun and relaxing experience, mainly because of the beautiful scenery and some interesting sidequests.

I wasn't going to bother with this one after reading that it's no improvement over the second, but some of the new elements do sound intriguing - I like the sound of the sanctuary menu system, and John Cleese as your butler. I think the map system (which was useless in the last game) also seems to have been improved. Are the areas still broken up with lengthy loading screens? One of the many things that annoyed me in Fable II, I was hoping for a more a consistent gameworld.

Anyway, this and a few other reviews have got me interested again, I might just get it when it drops in price.

HairyArse - on 28/10/2010 at 13:59 wrote:
One thing I forgot to mention in my review is that from your sanctuary you can now quick travel to anywhere in the game world which makes to-ing and fro-ing a hell of a lot easier.

Kay - I've been properly caning it these last few weeks. Not sure I can keep this pace up.

Kay - on 28/10/2010 at 14:40 wrote:
A few weeks, that long? I'd definitely have noticed if someone on my friends list was playing it. Was it one of those promo copies that doesn't show up - or did you have to use a different gamertag?

Anyway, what I meant was that the review came as a bit of a (pleasant) surprise. :)

HairyArse - on 28/10/2010 at 15:03 wrote:
Oh I mean a few weeks hammering out various gamses I've reviewed recently. As it was I got Fable III a week early.

Kay - on 28/10/2010 at 16:54 wrote:
Oh yeah, you do seem to have reviewed a lot of big-hitters lately. Sounds like you need to delegate more often. :)

HairyArse - on 28/10/2010 at 16:55 wrote:
Ha well to be fair most of what I've covered recently has been stuff I've bought or been given. DJ Hero 2 was my birthday present.

peej - on 28/10/2010 at 18:53 wrote:
Indeedy. If we were getting review / preview copies of stuff like Fable III and DJ Hero I'd probably stop twitbitching about sites that give massively high scores to stuff like Rock Band III and DJ Hero 2, despite getting 'em for nought and not having to factor in how much the bloody things cost :)

HairyArse - on 28/10/2010 at 18:55 wrote:
Well as it happens I did get a review copy of Fable III but it was something I was eager to play myself.

Just gotta get Saw II out of the way then I'm all clear for Black Ops and maybe Rock Band 3...

oneiros - on 29/10/2010 at 14:37 wrote:
Woah; spoilers there Hairy!

Played through the first three hours or so last night (just got me Mercenary disguise sorted) and I absolutely agree with the Fable 2.5 statement. Not that that's a problem as such; I loved Fable 2 and am happy to have more of the same. As you say though, it is rather unusual for Lionhead to be so timid.

In my opinion, the changes to the menu system, as defined by the Sanctuary and the Road to Rule are a step backwards. The improved map is welcome, but I don't think rendering menus as a 3D world makes them any more accessible. Just slower.

However, my biggest gripe is that some of the text sizes are just too damn small on an SD television. When I want to interact with a villager, I have to squint to work our whether I'm going to kiss them or fart in their face. It's disgraceful that this still happens, and from one of the UK's most highly regarded developers. :(

Kay - on 01/11/2010 at 11:34 wrote:
However, my biggest gripe is that some of the text sizes are just too damn small on an SD television.

This is a bit of a bugbear for me with most HD games nowadays. There's absolutely no reason for text to be so damn small. Maybe it's just my eyes, but even on an HDTV I have to squint with some games.

I noticed in the demo that Vanquish had an SDTV option that made the text + HUD nice and big, makes you wonder why other games can't do that as well.

oneiros - on 01/11/2010 at 15:03 wrote:
I'm actually starting to come 'round to the idea of The Sanctuary as a menu, now that I've a better idea of where everything is. Still haven't found an Inventory though; any ideas?

And why couldn't direct access to the map be, er, mapped to the unused Back button? /grr

HairyArse - on 01/11/2010 at 15:14 wrote:
I think you only get to see the items in your inventory when you try and sell them at the pawnbrokers. At least that's the only time I could access them.

ilmaestro - on 02/11/2010 at 02:28 wrote:
"However, my biggest gripe is that some of the text sizes are just too damn small on an SD television."

2010, dude.

/only half tongue-in-cheek

18 comment(s) in total.
NAIRI: Tower of Shirin Review (0) (09/01)
Point and Squee
Darksiders 3 Review (0) (21/12)
The Filth and the Fury
Call of Cthulhu Review (0) (08/11)
Fishy Goings On
Red Dead Redemption 2 Review (0) (07/11)
Wicky Wicky Wild Wild West
NAIRI: Tower of Shirin Review (0) (09/01)
Point and Squee
Darksiders 3 Review (0) (21/12)
The Filth and the Fury
Call of Cthulhu Review (0) (08/11)
Fishy Goings On
Red Dead Redemption 2 Review (0) (07/11)
Wicky Wicky Wild Wild West
Hearthstone Beta Review - Gather Round (1) (24/02)
Gather Round Blizzard's Latest Cash-Cow
Dream: The Hypersloth Interview - Part 3 (0) (18/11)
Fears before bedtime
Dream: The Hypersloth Interview - Part 2 (2) (17/11)
I can't get no sleep...
Angband Retrospective (4) (25/10)
Learn to fear the letter D.
Why TitanFall is no Call of Duty Killer (5) (18/02)
But it's still bloody marvellous
Gioteck's PS3 Controller Range - Preview (0) (01/08)
Striving for excellence
Havin' a Go: Mass Effect 3 Multiplayer (4) (27/10)
Don't cry wolf just yet...
Shank 2 Set to Kick Your Ass in Early 2012 (0) (26/10)
Not actually a protein. Go on, google it.

Better late than never, eh Ror?
Khanivor - In response to: Battle Chasers: Nightwar Review - 248day(s) ago.
Enjoyed this, cheers!
evilashchris - In response to: Reflecting on the Life of a Tomb Raider - 333day(s) ago.
Looks who's back. Shady's back.
GOD - In response to: Sniper Elite 4 Review - Xbox One - 663day(s) ago.
Micro Machines was my favourite!
ClaytonNotClive - In response to: Mantis Burn Racing Review - 705day(s) ago.
i agree chris, the Aliens table makes the others look bad.. because its so goood!! but they arent that bad.. haha! ...
neosalad - In response to: Aliens Vs. Pinball Review - 967day(s) ago.